We know the rhythm of the words. God decides that something should be, and it is. And we are made in his image. We believe that is the way it works for us. If we do this and this and this And to a certain extent it does work that way.
If we study for the exam properly then the will probably pass the exam. If we practice the dance properly then we will probably be able to do the dance well. I can juggle three balls with relative ease I can fold a towel so that it makes a decent looking python But it doesn't always work like that.
Except for God What is worse, when we try to make life work so that it always works the way we want it to, then we try to be God. And that never works out. We need to let God be God. Imagine John the Baptist. He has been told from a very young age by his parents that he has a great destiny. He is to be the fore runner of the Messiah, preparing the people for God to be part of their lives.
It is like being a church minister. Only he isn't going to be like all those other ministers. He is going to tell it exactly as it is. No pulling any punches, no holding anything back. And the people flock. Oh how they flock. And he is true to his calling. Once the people come he stays loyal to his principles, exactly the way he has always been. He isn't tempted by money to get better clothes and project a better image of himself.
He sticks with the raggedy clothes and eating honey and locus. He isn't tempted by the prestige and influence to avoid getting into controversy. However, I think it would be useful to have some explanation of the "otherness" of God as seen in the Bible. I think that most non-Christians are unaware that the Bible has a particular view of God, that is different from their own.
It would be nice to have some discussion on the question of the otherness of God. The statement that your quoted from the Hindu believer has a Pantheistic notion in it. Contrast this with the way the Christian Holy Bible consistently teaches about God and His plan for humanity.
God is distinctly declared as the Creator of Heaven and Earth and the first human being. The account of the creation of the world starting from Genesis would be a good starting point.
The names ascribed to God in the ancient Hebrew traditions Old Testament would be another field of study that can profoundly improve our understanding on the observable attributes of God that His chosen people ascribed to Him.
God reveals Himself in three persons, co-equal, co-eternal the concept of Trinity in order to carry out the plan of Salvation. And lastly, and most pertinent when discussing Christianity with people of different faiths, is the fact that the Christian Bible is not a collection of wisdoms, it is not a collection of legends, it is not a collection of legalistic rules and regulations.
Instead, it use all those to weave a coherent blueprint and a model on how to connect ourselves to God, so we can participate in His plan using His strength. This plan has a definite beginning, and it has a definite end. It is not an cycle with indefinite number of iterations. Of course, this doesn't even began to describe how rich the revelation of God in the Scriptures really is.
This is just a starting point, a frame of mind to start a discussion. Other differences are hard to explain because the scripture is not clear at this point, except that it explicitly uses the words 'image' and 'likeness', with no further explanation of it. Really, the Bible doesn't offer us what this "Image of God" exactly means.
Theologians from the past and today are still attempting to explain what these words mean and Biblical scholars still have no consensus about the meaning of the term. It is obvious that man inherited some nature and attributes of God.
Hence, there is nothing wrong to infer that God has two eyes and one nose but no one should not make such deductions. The main difficulty here is that no one has seen God and the Bible never mention how God looks like. Another difficulty we have is that God is invisible and though God is invisible to us, it still doesn't mean that God has no form. The scripture again tells us that Jesus is the image of God, which further complicates the whole thing. The Son is the image of the invisible God , the firstborn over all creation.
Colossians , NIV. Nothing really makes sense. We can't really explain this. In the end, the entirety of mankind will come to acknowledge Almighty God as the one true God, and they will all witness how Almighty God fulfills His words and brings forth the end of the age. After Almighty God has made a group of overcomers, all kinds of disasters will rain down, and all mankind will fall into disasters and be refined.
Only then will God descend openly with clouds to manifest Himself to all nations and all peoples. The man that God uses merely cooperates with God's work, fulfilling man's duty. This is the main difference between the work of God incarnate and the work of the men used by God, a difference that is determined completely by the distinct substances of God and man.
Just now we fellowshiped the difference between the work of God incarnate and the work of the men used by God. This flesh is unlike any man that is of the flesh. This difference is because Christ is not of flesh and blood; He is the incarnation of the Spirit. He has both a normal humanity and a complete divinity. His divinity is not possessed by any man. And so, among all those with a human shell like His, among all those who possess humanity, only He is the incarnate God Himself—all others are created humans.
This is definite and incontrovertible. Since God becomes flesh, He shall bring forth the work He intends to do, and since God becomes flesh, He shall express what He is, and shall be able to bring the truth to man, bestow life upon him, and point the way for him. Flesh that does not have the essence of God is decidedly not the incarnate God; of this there is no doubt.
Although He has normal humanity, He is of divine substance. The men that God uses, however, are of human substance. They can only be human, and have no divine substance at all. This flesh is the flesh with divine substance, the real God who has come to earth to work and save mankind. He can bestow upon man the truth, the way, and the life, and this is far beyond the capacity of any created human. All that Christ expresses is the truth, and that is God's work in the new age.
Because Christ has complete divinity, He can express the truth at any time and any place to supply, water, and shepherd people, to guide all mankind. He can lead and redeem mankind, conquer and save mankind, conclude the entire old age. But the men God uses are of human substance. They possess no divinity, but are merely human. He can directly express the truth and guide the entirety of mankind. This is the essential difference between God incarnate and the men God uses or the men who have the work of the Holy Spirit.
Just like in the Age of Grace, the Lord Jesus revealed the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, brought the way of repentance, and expressed His disposition of lovingkindness and mercy, and so on. They are all direct expressions of the Spirit of God, are all natural revelations of the disposition of God and all that He has and is.
In the last days, Almighty God expresses all the truth that will purify, save, and perfect mankind. The work and word of God incarnate and His expressed disposition are enough to prove that God incarnate is divine in substance, and that He is no other than God Himself, the One and only.
This is the fulfillment of man's duty. They do the work that the human mind is capable of, the work that man can experience, the work that is essentially what man has and is. Because God incarnate and the men He uses are different in substance, their work is completely different in nature.
God incarnate differs from the men that He uses, just as much as God differs from man. God keep men helpless, men then live lives of toil to avoid starvation.
Work cited Rhodes. R, Notes on the Problem of Evil. Nabi and Hozeh are close synonyms. The roles a prophet filled during the period of the Hebrew Kingdom, from Saul to the exile and return from Babylon Prophets played an important role in Israel political life. In the monarchy and rise to power of Saul, Samuel played an important role in the decision and action. Samuel was at the frontline in the appointment of David 1sam ; Even prophets who had a strong burden to correct false religious practice like Hosea addressed political issues strongly.
Prophets would be consulted about the future. They were powerful to bless or curse, like in the Moabite prophet Balaam illustrates nun Jeremiah, after many years of warning his people of unidentified evil coming from north, wearied by the non fulfillment of his prophecies, even his family members plotted against him to take his life in order to silence him.
Differences between visions and messages of the prophets Prophet in the bible were not were not primarily foretellers, they in addition seeing would criticize the present wrong doing, injustice, oppression, and rich , luxurious worship while the poor starved. Amos, for instance looked at the future often to warn.
He warned against disobedience and its repercussions. Main differences and similarities between God and human according to Hebrew Scriptures. Accessed November 14, Download paper. Essay, Pages 6 words. Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay on. Get quality help now.
0コメント